Open Access

Ash fall impact on vegetation: a remote sensing approach of the Oldoinyo Lengai 2007–08 eruption

  • Ann De Schutter1,
  • Matthieu Kervyn1Email author,
  • Frank Canters2,
  • Sonja A Bosshard-Stadlin3,
  • Majura A M Songo4 and
  • Hannes B Mattsson3
Journal of Applied VolcanologySociety and Volcanoes20154:15

DOI: 10.1186/s13617-015-0032-z

Received: 6 January 2015

Accepted: 5 May 2015

Published: 16 May 2015

Abstract

Impacts from ash fallout on the environment can be widespread and long lasting, even from moderate-size eruptions. Assessing ash impact on vegetation and the indirect impacts for people is often difficult in the field. Here it is assessed how satellite data can help to map vegetation affected by ash and how temporal analysis enables characterization of vegetation recovery rate. The 2007–08 eruption of Oldoinyo Lengai, north Tanzania, is here used as a case study. An 8 year-long (2005–2012) time series of half-monthly average of the Normalized Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) is constructed at 250 m spatial resolution from the Moderate Resolution Image Spectro-radiometer (MODIS) sensor. Interpolated rainfall data is used to isolate NDVI values departing from the normal seasonal cycles. Month-to-month NDVI comparison, linear temporal trend analysis and Principal Component Analysis enable to identify a 11 × 4 km area over which ash fallout significantly affected the state of the vegetation. After the eruption’s end, time series of various recovery indices highlight a circumferential pattern in vegetation recovery. The estimated recovery time varies from more than 5 years to less than 6 months with increasing distance from the volcano. A non-linear moderate, but statistically significant, relationship is found between the recovery indices and the spatial variation of ash thicknesses measured in the field. Combining field and remote sensing constraints enable to re-assess the volume of the eruption to ~2 × 107 m3. The spatial pattern of the ash-affected area matches with the spatial contrast in the impact experienced by the local communities. The method applied here opens the scope to document impact and intensity of ash fallout in areas where systematic field work is not possible and to support recovery plans for populations affected by ash fallout.

Keywords

Volcanic ash Vegetation recovery Time series analysis Remote sensing Oldoinyo Lengai

Introduction

Ash fallout produced by volcanic eruptions, even of moderate magnitude, are responsible for severe impacts around volcanoes, due to burial, overloading, or different physical or chemical processes affecting plant growth or foliage state even for thin tephra coverage (see Ayiris and Delmelle 2012 and reference therein). Fires ignited by hot tephra and chemical impacts of toxic gases via air pollution, acid rains or soil water contamination are other processes by which explosive eruptions impact on vegetation (e.g., Delmelle 2003; Delmelle et al. 2002). Tephra layer thickness, grainsize and physico-chemical properties as well as the morphology and phenology of the plants and the residence time of the tephra layer have been shown to impact the extent of these impacts (Ayiris and Delmelle 2012). Vegetation destruction or deterioration by volcanic ash may result in long term impacts for livestock, agriculture and eventually for human activity and health (e.g., Wilson et al. 2011). Shrub and herbaceous vegetation have been shown to be more vulnerable than trees to ash, being already severely affected by a few centimetres of ash (del Moral and Grishin 1999; Ayiris and Delmelle 2012).

It is generally time-consuming and difficult to accurately constrain the extent and thickness of volcanic ash layers, and the spatial variation of impacts on the flora, fauna and human activities from field surveys. This is especially true for long lasting eruptions when ash fallout will occur repetitively over weeks or months, for volcanic regions which are less accessible and for more distal and thin ash layers that are poorly preserved over more than a season.

Although many studies highlight the impact of volcanic ash fallout on vegetation (e.g., Ayiris and Delmelle 2012 and references therein), fewer studies document the recovery of vegetation after ash deposition and the factors influencing its recovery, with the exception of the studies following the eruptions of Mt Lamington (Taylor 1957), Pinatubo (De Rose et al. 2011), Mt St Helens (Saito et al. 1998; Frenzen 1992; Harrington et al. 1998; Marzen et al. 2011,) and Chaiten volcanoes (Martin et al. 2009). Vegetation types, ash thickness, rainfall, erosion pattern and rate, and human influence were identified as important factors controlling vegetation recovery (Frenzen 1992; Harrington et al. 1998; del Moral and Grishin 1999; Marzen et al. 2011). De Rose et al. (2011) further concluded that watershed topography and geology have an important impact on the trajectory and the speed of vegetation recovery.

Most of these studies were based on temporal analysis of species distribution documented in the field. Only De Rose et al. (2011) and Marzen et al. (2011) used vegetation indices derived from remote sensing data to analyse vegetation recovery at volcanoes. Marzen et al. (2011) monitored vegetation recovery from 1980 to 2005 at Mt St Helens using bi-temporal difference analysis of NDVI-Landsat images. Such an approach is more commonly used to map the impact of, and study the recovery from, forest fires (Diaz-Delgado et al. 1998; Salvador and Pons 1996; Riaño et al. 2002; Diaz-Delgado et al. 2003; Gouveia et al. 2010; Hope et al. 2012).

Here we study the temporal evolution of vegetation around Oldoinyo Lengai (OL) in North Tanzania using low spatial resolution remote sensing data. The objective is to investigate how the vegetation characteristics responded to the 10 month-long violent Strombolian to Vulcanian-style eruption in 2007–08 (Vaughan et al. 2008; Kervyn et al. 2010). It is tested if the analysis of vegetation change from remote sensing time series can help to identify and map the zone that has been affected by significant ash fallout. In addition, using the analogy with vegetation recovery after forest fires (Diaz-Delgado et al. 1998; Salvador and Pons 1996; Riaño et al. 2002; Diaz-Delgado et al. 2003; Gouveia et al. 2010; Hope et al. 2012), we investigate how the vegetation recovery rate can be quantified and if it is correlated with the spatial variation of the thickness of the deposited ash layer.

Oldoinyo Lengai and the 2007–08 eruption

Oldoinyo Lengai (OL) is a stratovolcano of the East African Rift System, located in North Tanzania, 16 km south of Lake Natron (Fig. 1a). With its 2952 m a.s.l summit, Oldoinyo Lengai rises 2000 m above the plain of the Gregory rift valley. Similar to the Serengeti plains to the West, the vegetation in the rift and above the rift escarpment is characterized by open grasslands to shrublands with scattered trees, varying with topography and rainfall distribution (Fig. 2f; see Reed et al. 2009; White 1986). The Crater Highlands south west of OL are covered by a dense shrubbed forest (Fig. 1b; Reed et al. 2009). The climate of the region is characterized by a short rain season from October to December, and a long and more abundant one from March to May.
Fig. 1

Oldoinyo Lengai, surrounding volcanoes and tectonic structures. a: Shaded relief map based on the SRTM Digital Elevation Model highlighting main volcanoes and craters; (b) Land cover map of the study area based on the FAO classification scheme (FAO 1998). Red lines highlight the approximated isopach lines of the 2007–08 ash layers inferred by Sherrod et al. (2013). The full triangle marks the location of Oldoinyo Lengai

Fig. 2

Illustration of the impact of ash on Oldoinyo Lengai and its direct surrounding. a: Summit of OL looking south-east during the eruption (March 12, 2008; photo courtesy B. Wihelmi); (b) Ash covering vegetation along the west flank of OL and the rift escarpment (January 18, 2008; photo courtesy T. Pfeiffer); (c) Ash fall in valley cutting across the rift escarpment two years after the eruption (June 8, 2010; photo courtesy Th. Holden); (d) Boma Lesele, 4 km west of OL crater located in the major ashfall zone (December 6, 2007; photo courtesy of J. Keller); (e) Ash fall deposits on W flank of OL and destroyed vegetation (May 14, 2011; photo by S. Stadlin); (f) Recent regeneration of vegetation north of OL (May 2013; photo by S. Stadlin)

Oldoinyo Lengai has been extensively studied for its petrology, as it is the only active volcano known to have erupted natrocarbonatite lava from 1983 to 2006 (e.g., Bell et al. 1998; Dawson 1998; Zaitsev and Keller 2006; Kervyn et al. 2008). OL is however built up dominantly by nephelinite and phonolite ash and lava deposits, natrocarbonatites representing a minor volume (e.g., Klaudius and Keller 2006). OL eruptive activity is characterized by phases of effusive eruption of natrocarbonatite lava and nephelinite explosive phases, known to have occurred in 1917, 1940–1941, and 1966–1967 (Dawson et al. 1968; 1995; 1992).

On September 4, 2007, a 3 km-high eruption column dispersed ash up to 20 km from the summit (Vaughan et al. 2008). This event marked the start of a new explosive eruptive phase characterized by repetitive short-lived ash eruptions of varying intensity, as documented by Kervyn et al. (2010). After the onset, the activity varied from 100 m high ash jets to 2–15 km high, steady or unsteady, eruption columns. The eruption was most intense at the end of September 2007 and in February-March 2008, the latter phase being associated with the largest ash dispersal and the first pyroclastic flows to be documented at OL (Kervyn et al. 2010). The petrology of the 2007–08 eruption and the processes responsible for the eruption style transition are discussed in Mitchell and Dawson (2007); Keller et al. (2010); de Moor et al. (2013) and Bosshard-Stadlin et al. (2014). The main explosive activity lasted until end of April 2008 with only gas and minor ash emissions being observed afterward until resumption of lava effusion at the end of 2008. The volume erupted by the 2007–08 eruption sequence was estimated at ~107 m3 (Kervyn et al. 2010) but this estimate was not based on systematic documentation of ash thickness in the field.

Most of the erupted material was deposited on the upper volcano flanks. Proximal deposition built up a ~400 m wide, ~75 m high pyroclastic cone. By early December 2007, Keller et al. (2010) observed 5 and 1 cm ash thickness at the W and S volcano base, respectively. Three months after the onset of the eruption, all the vegetation on OL’s flanks was already dead or fully buried (Fig. 2). Even if ash fallout was reported in villages within the rift valley for specific eruptive events (e.g., in Engare Sero, north of OL, on September 4, 2007), most of the fallout was recorded on the W flank and above the 500 m high rift escarpment. This is consistent with the West-blowing trade winds (Kervyn et al. 2010). The most intense eruptions in February-March 2008 dispersed ash over larger areas, with millimetre-thick fallout being reported as far as 100 km to the SW (i.e., Lake Eyasi and Ngorongoro caldera; Kervyn et al. 2010).

A preliminary isopach map of the 2007–08 ash fallout was produced by Sherrod et al. (Sherrod et al. 2013), constraining a 5–10 cm isopach line, and partially constraining the limit of a 1–5 cm thickness isopach line (Fig. 1b). Naiyobi and Kapenjiro villages, each with 5000 to 6000 inhabitants, were affected by the thickest ashfall of all settlements surrounding OL. This first characterization of the ash fallout is here completed with additional field observations and remote sensing analysis.

No study exists on the processes by which OL eruption impacted the surrounding vegetation but field observations (Fig. 2) suggest that burial, overloading or prolonged coverage of leaves were the main processes causing vegetation destruction or decay. Fires ignited by lava overflowing the crater in the days before the onset of explosive eruptions also impacted vegetation on OL west and east flanks (Kervyn et al. 2010). Gas emissions from OL have been shown to be dominated by water vapour and CO2, with limited emission of SO2, H2S, HCl or HF (Koepenick et al. 1996; de Moor et al. 2013). Direct effect of gas emissions from OL has never been reported and is considered negligible here. Ash leaching experiments carried out by de Moor et al. (2008) and Stadlin (2015) showed that OL ash contained a high concentration of leachable ions, mostly fluorine, which constitutes a major hazard for local groundwater supply and for the grazing cattle but without observed direct effect on vegetation state.

The local communities living around OL are dominantly Masai who are dependent on cattle for their livelihood, but other tribes developing agriculture are also present in the region. Ash fallout was reported to cause respiratory problems to local residents living in villages on the escarpment west of OL. At locations where heavy ash fallout was experienced, within 25 km west of the volcano, local communities spontaneously evacuated to less affected areas. A survey conducted in May 2011 in 8 different settlements (99 interviewees) surrounding OL highlights the difference in impacts experienced based on the proximity and geographic location of the settlement to OL. In Naiyobi, a large settlement located downwind from OL, over 80 % of interviewees decided to relocate on a voluntary basis for several months during the eruption. Temporal relocation of up to 10 months also occurred for part of the population in Engare Sero and Engaruka-Ngwesuku, 15 and 7 km of OL in the N and SE direction, respectively. In the other settlements located further away from OL, only few respondents declared to have evacuated, typically for shorter durations.

The decision of relocation was motivated mainly by the lack of green pastures for the cattle (NEMC 2008), but interviewees were also worried about their safety and health and access to safe water. Most of them reported eye irritation and some reported respiratory problems. The impact for the cattle included death, miscarriage and skin irritation. 74 % of respondents experienced crop destruction due to the ash and 88 % reported an overall loss of income. Thin ash fallout was enough to prevent livestock from grazing and forced temporary resettlements. The total number of displaced people is evaluated at 5,000 to 7,000 people, whereas about 65,000 people are estimated to have been affected by the eruption (NEMC 2008). Several NGO’s and the Red Cross had to provide food aid for approximately 36,000 people (Msami 2007).

Datasets and methods

Vegetation index: dataset and pre-processing

Different Vegetation Indices (VI) have been defined to characterize the state and density of vegetation from the spectral reflectance of a surface in the visible and near-infrared wavelengths. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), defined by the difference of reflectance in near-infrared and red, divided by the sum of both, was one of the first indices proposed (Tucker 1979) and up till today the most used. Different Soil Adjusted VIs (SAVI) were defined and tested to better relate the VI to the biophysical properties of the vegetation but these indices do not always outperform the NDVI (Carreiras et al. 2006; Clemente et al. 2009). Veraverbeke et al. (2012) concluded that in applications concerning post-fire vegetation recovery, the NDVI is the most suitable index due to its normalizing capacity for vegetation variability, which makes that it is strongly correlated to the above-ground biomass in different ecosystems (Clemente et al. 2009; Lhermitte et al. 2010). NDVI will also be used here as it has proved robust in previous remote sensing studies on vegetation monitoring, including vegetation recovery after forest fire (e.g., Diaz-Delgado et al. 1998; Riaño et al. 2002; Hope et al. 2012).

To monitor vegetation evolution during and after ash fallout, a dataset offering a balance between a sufficiently high spatial and a moderate temporal resolution was selected. In addition the dataset had to be able to provide reliable and consistent data throughout the year despite the frequent cloud coverage common to most equatorial countries. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer (MODIS) satellite acquires daily images of the entire world at 250–1000 m spatial resolution since 1999 (Ernst et al. 2008). The MOD13Q1 16-day NDVI composites are used here (LPDAAC 2013; http://lpdaac.usgs.gov): these data are derived from the MOD09 daily surface reflectance product, which is already corrected for molecular scattering, ozone absorption and aerosols (Vermote et al. 2002). These composite images are built up using the Maximum Value Composite algorithm filtering for data quality, cloud and viewing geometry (Huete et al. 2002; Solano et al. 2010). The first 16-day composites of each month from January 2005 till May 2013 were used to build up a time series for the study area.

As errors due to cloud cover, sensor characteristics and variations in atmospheric conditions are still present in the MODIS NDVI time series (Viovy et al. 1992), each pixel’s time series was filtered with the TIMESAT algorithm. TIMESAT (Jönsson and Eklundh 2002, 2004) aims at least squares fitting of a function on the time series to filter out noise and remove spikes (Olsson et al. 2012). Contrasted fitting functions, Gaussian or logistic, were obtained for different land-cover categories. The result of this operation was the corrected monthly NDVIcorr time series for each pixel over 7 years (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Typical NDVI time series for selected pixels in the study area: (a) on Oldoinyo Lengai, (b) in the ash affected zone, (c) in the Crater Highland forest, (d) in the savannah. The original NDVI and the NDVIcorr after TIMESAT correction are shown for each pixel from May 2005 to May 2013. (e) Interpolated rainfall time series from May 2005 to May 2010. Note the grey shading highlighting the eruption period. f: NDVI image of study area in February 2008 with location of pixels analysed in A-D

Seasonal variation in precipitation is the main control on the temporal variation of the NDVIcorr time series (Ding et al. 2007; Markogianni et al. 2012). In order to isolate the effect of ash on vegetation, the NDVI time series had to be de-correlated from precipitation (Zhou et al. 2009). Daily precipitation data were acquired from the Tanzania Meteorological Agency from March 2005 to May 2010 for 4 stations located within 110 km of Oldoinyo Lengai (Arusha 110 km to SE, Monduli 88 km to SE, Loliondo 80 km to NNW, Karatu 70 km to SW). All stations showed similar seasonal and inter-annual rainfall variations, despite different total annual precipitation. A single rainfall time series was interpolated based on an Inverse Squared Distance Weighted interpolation from the 4 stations. The precipitation value obtained for the location of Oldoinyo Lengai was used to decorrelate the NDVIcorr time series over the entire study area. This simplification is required due to the scarcity of available weather stations and the lack of local modelling of the rainfall spatial variability in the study area.

Zhou et al. (2009) used regression analysis to filter out NDVI variation caused by rainfall. Here we divided the study area into sub-regions of different land cover and elevation ranges, assuming that the reaction of vegetation to precipitation depends on altitude and vegetation type (Reed et al. 2009). Rainfall decorrelation was carried out separately for each sub-region using a polynomial relationship between NDVI and preceding precipitation, similarly to Razali and Nuruddin (2011). As the ash-affected vegetation would disturb the NDVI-precipitation relationship, the parameters of the regression for each sub-region were obtained using only pixels located outside a broadly defined zone potentially affected by ash.

Precipitation amounts were summed up for every 16-day period to correspond to the time span covered by the semi-monthly NDVI data. The second-order regression analysis was carried out between the precipitation of the preceding 16 day-period and the corresponding average NDVI value for each vegetation-elevation class separately. This procedure was repeated for preceding rainfall periods of 32 to 102 days to obtain the time lag which showed the highest correlation between NDVI and precipitation. NDVI variation expected from rainfall variability (NDVI exp ) can be derived with the following function:
$$ NDV{I}_{exp} = a + b\ .\ {P}_x + c\ .\ {P_x}^2 $$
(1)
with a, b and c the coefficients of the regression analysis and Px the preceding precipitation for the period returning the highest correlation (Fig. 4, Zhou et al. 2009). This way, the deviance between the expected and observed value of NDVIcorr can be derived:
Fig. 4

Example of the polynomial relationship between the average bi-monthly NDVI and the 48 days antecedent rainfall for herbaceous vegetation between 1500 and 2100 m a.s.l. The 48 days antecedent rainfall provided the best statistical relationship

$$ NDV{I}_{dif} = NDV{I}_{corr}\hbox{--}\ NDV{I}_{exp} $$
(2)

A negative NDVIdif means a lower NDVI is observed for a pixel than the value expected for that vegetation type at that elevation after the experienced rainfall. It will here be tested if the variation of NDVIdif can be attributed to the impact of ash fallout.

Mapping vegetation affected by ash

Detection of the ash impact on vegetation around OL was performed using bi-temporal analysis and Principal Component Analysis of the NDVIdif time series. Bi-temporal change detection compares two periods in time by removing all variances caused by non-relevant factors to measure change only caused by differences in the variable of interest (Green et al. 1994). Using bi-temporal change detection, the sensor’s spectral and spatial resolution, the acquisition date and time, the atmospheric conditions, and the phenological state of the vegetation should be similar (Lu et al. 2004). The bi-temporal change analysis was carried out on the NDVIdif time series, removing the potential effect of rainfall variation. Data were compared for the same month of the year for the periods preceding, spanning and following the eruption, after normalization of the data range in each scene.

A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) linearly transforms data into a new set of uncorrelated principal components sorted according to the variance explained in the original data (Schowengerdt 2007). The standardized PCA algorithm converts all scenes of NDVIdif values to standard scores which results in equal weights for all scenes within the time series in the derivation of new component images (Schowengerdt 2007). A standardized PCA was carried out on the NDVIdif time series from July 2005 to May 2010 with the objective of isolating the signal of ash-affected vegetation. The duration of the time series was chosen in order to cover two full years before and after the eruption.

Vegetation recovery indices

In addition to mapping the area affected by ash fall with remote sensing, we aim at characterizing the recovery rate of the affected vegetation and see how this recovery is related to the ash thickness deposited at any given location. In order to be able to examine a long enough time period for deriving Vegetation Recovery Indexes, the NDVIcorr time series was extended to May 2013. NDVIcorr is used here, and not NDVIdif, as the goal is to see how vegetation recovers to its pre-eruption state, including its sensitivity to rainfall variation.

First, an NDVI trend analysis was carried out using the Ordinary Least Square procedure (OLS). OLS calculates the slope coefficient α of the linear regression between time and values of NDVIcorr.
$$ NDV{I}_{corr}(t) = a\ .\ t + b $$
(3)

This results in an expression for the rate of change over a set of time steps in such a way that the slope values calculated for the period following the eruption can be interpreted as recovery rates. In a normal phenological year the beginning of a wet season is characterized by positive slope values, followed by negative slope values in the dry season leading to a slope value around zero for the yearly variation. This makes it possible to detect a disturbance which will cause these slope values to differ from zero. The NDVI trend analysis was carried out for three time spans: the pre-eruptive period (May 2005 – May 2007), the eruption (May 2007 – May 2008), the post-eruptive period as a whole (May 2008 – May 2013).

Second, different recovery indices were calculated for the different time intervals following the eruption (Table 1). Previous studies proposed vegetation recovery indices based on spatial comparison between undisturbed and deteriorated vegetation within the same scene (e.g., Diaz-Delgado et al. 1998; Diaz-Delgado et al. 2003; Riaño et al. 2002) or through temporal comparison of the vegetation state within each pixel separately (e.g., Gouveia et al. 2010; Hope et al. 2012; Lu et al. 2012). The high vegetation variability within the study area makes it difficult to select unambiguous control sites for spatial comparison. We therefore opted for the latter approach. As highlighted in Table 1, all the indices that were used are based on the pixel NDVIcorr value at different times t after the eruption (NDVI post ) and the corresponding NDVIcorr value before (NDVI pre ) and/or directly after the eruption (NDVI erup or NDVI lowest ).
Table 1

Vegetation recovery indices used to document the recovery of vegetation over time after the eruption. All NDVI values used in these indices are NDVIcorr values

Name

Index

Reference

Lack of greenness (LG)

\( LG(t)=NDV{I}_{post}(t)-NDV{I}_{pre}^{*} \)

Gouveia et al. (2010)

Change in NDVI (Tc)

\( {T}_c(t)=\frac{NDV{I}_{pre}^{*}-NDV{I}_{post}(t)}{NDV{I}_{pre}^{*}} \)

Lu et al. (2012)

Stand Regeneration Index (SRI)

\( SRI(t)=\frac{NDV{I}_{post}(t)}{NDV{I}_{pre}^{*}} \)

Hope et al. (2012)

Vegetation Recovery Rate (VRR)

\( VRR(t)=\frac{NDV{I}_{post}(t)-NDV{I}_{erup}}{NDV{I}_{pre}^{*}-NDV{I}_{erup}} \)

Chou et al. (2009); Lu et al. (2012)

Ash Recovery Index (ARI)

\( ARI(t)=\frac{NDV{I}_{post}(t)-NDV{I}_{lowest}}{NDV{I}_{\max pre}-NDV{I}_{lowest}} \)

Adapted from Hope et al. (2012)

NDVI pre *: NDVI value of the optimal vegetation cyclus derived by taking the average of NDVI for the corresponding month from 2005 to 2007 per pixel

NDVImax pre : maximum NDVI value registered for a pixel within the two year before the eruption

NDVI lowest : minimum NDVI value registered for a pixel over the year following the end of the eruption

NDVI erup : NDVI value registered for each pixel in the month directly following the end of the eruption

The ‘Lack of greenness’ index (LG) is a simple difference between the NDVI value of each pixel before and after the event (Gouveia et al. 2010). The pre-event value is determined as the average NDVI for the corresponding month recorded from 2005 to September 2007 (NDVI* pre ). The ‘Change in NDVI’ parameter (Tc) is similar to the ‘Lack of greenness’, with opposite sign, but it is normalized by the value of the pre-event NDVI (Lu et al. 2012), whereas the ‘Stand Regeneration Index’ (SRI) is a simple ratio between the post- and pre-event NDVI. The ‘Vegetation Recovery Rate’ (VRR) is a ratio of the recovery after the eruption and the change in vegetation caused by the eruption: the NDVI value recorded for the month following the end of the eruption (NDVIerup) is subtracted from the pre- and post-event NDVI values (Chou et al. 2009; Lu et al. 2012). Finally, we propose the Ash Recovery Index (ARI) which is an adaptation of the VRR index based on Hope et al. (2012). In the ARI, the pre-eruption NDVI is calculated as the maximum NDVI value recorded for each pixel in the pre-eruptive period. The lowest NDVI (NDVI lowest ) recorded in the year following the end of the eruption is used as representative of the vegetation status following the eruption.

In order to remove signals from pixels not affected by the eruption, the above indices were only calculated for the pixels for which the NDVImax pre – NDVI erup value is above 0.25. It should be noted that the value of LG will be negative and that of Tc positive but both decrease in absolute value over time for vegetation recovering after the eruption. The three other indices (SRI, VRR ARI) are positive and increasing over time for recovering vegetation.

Vegetation recovery rate

In order to define the recovery rate from the recovery indices (RI), a logarithmic regression model is fitted through the values of the RI through time, similar to Diaz-Delgado et al. (1998 1998).
$$ RI\ (t) = \alpha + \beta log\ t $$
(4)

With α the constant and β the slope of the logarithmic relationship, and t the time of the NDVIcorr image. This relationship is obtained for each pixel of the study area separately. The logarithmic relationship assumes that the recovery rate will be rapid directly after the event and will thereafter slow down to reach the pre-event level. It is expected that the slope of this relationship will give an indication about the intensity of the vegetation recovery and can thus be correlated to ash fall thickness. The type and strength of the relationship with ash thickness will be tested statistically. Negative slope values indicate no significant recovery through time and are therefore disregarded in the analysis. However, in order for pixels which have not yet recovered to be taken into account, a small constant is added to the derived slope values, in order for slope values close to 0 to become positive. This is justified as only pixels very close to the volcano display near-zero values, whereas vegetation not significantly affected by the eruption displays significant negative slope values (see Results).

Using this logarithmic regression it is also possible to define the recovery time for each pixel. The average value of the recovery index is calculated for NDVIcorr values observed during the pre-eruptive phase (January 2005 – June 2007). The recovery time is considered as the time required for the post-eruption recovery index to reach the mean value of the index in the pre-eruptive phase.

Validation dataset: field mapping of ash thickness

Thickness of the ash layer deposited by the 2007–08 eruption of Oldoinyo Lengai was documented in the field by several research parties. 20 observations were made in 2009 and 2010 by D. Sherrod (USGS, pers. comm.). de Moor et al. (2013) took 19 control points with ash thicknesses as averages of ~5-6 holes per site in 2009. An additional 105 locations with ash thickness observations, presented in Bosshard-Stadlin et al. (2014), were collected during field work between 2010 and 2013. It is to be noted that most sites are located within 7 km of OL summit, and that no observations have been made above the rift escarpment west of the volcano due to limited accessibility. This prevents the characterization of the medial to distal portion of the ash fallout. Recorded ash thickness varies between 4 mm and 84 cm, all thicknesses greater than 20 cm being recorded on OL flanks.

Results

Mapping ash impact on vegetation

Bi-temporal changes

Figure 5 illustrates the results from bi-temporal change detection. Limited vegetation changes are observed between October 2006 and October 2007 around OL, one month after the start of the eruption, beyond the general decrease in vegetation status over the area at the end of the dry season (Fig. 5a). Larger NDVI differences are obtained for the January 2007–2008 period over the entire study area (Fig. 5b). A 7 × 18 km area extending WNW from OL displays a significant negative vegetation change. January is in the middle of the growing season leading to greater differences in NDVIdif also outside the ash-affected areas: the forest and shrub savannah region above the rift escarpment show a general improvement whereas the grassland savannah of the rift valley show a general decrease over that period, probably caused by local variations of the rainfall amount. Comparing the vegetation before and at the end of the eruption in May 2007 and 2008, the vegetation affected by the ash deposits is clearly identified above the background variations (Fig. 5c). The ash affected area is mapped as a near-elliptical 11 × 24 km area elongated to the west.
Fig. 5

Bi-temporal change detection results for NDVIdif for different periods: (a) Oct 2006–07; (b) Jan 2007–2008; (c) May 2007–2008

Principal component analysis

Table 2 and Fig. 6 illustrate the results of the Principal Component Analysis on the monthly NDVIdif time series from July 2005 to May 2010. The first six principal components have eigenvalues above one and explain together more than 80 % of the total variance (Table 2). PC1 reflects the main variation of the data (~60 % of the total variance). PC 2 to PC 5 display various spatial patterns and temporal variation in the loadings which can be interpreted as spatial and temporal variations in vegetation state not properly accounted for by the NDVI rainfall correction.
Table 2

Statistical results of the Principal Component Analysis, with the number of principal components considered in the interpretation marked in bold

Principal component

Eigenvalues

Proportion of variance (%)

Cumulative variance (%)

1

37.01

62.73

62.7

2

5.25

8.90

71.6

3

2.75

4.66

76.3

4

2.06

3.48

79.8

5

1.34

2.27

82.0

6

1.06

1.79

83.8

7

1.00

1.71

85.5

8

0.88

1.79

87.3

9

0.77

1.31

88.6

Fig. 6

Principal component analysis of the vegetation time series: (a) Map of the factor scores for the sixth component of the PCA carried out on the NDVIdif time series from July 2005 to May 2010; (b) Component loadings for the sixth principal component, with variables being the monthly NDVIdif values for each pixel. Note the grey shading highlighting the eruption period

PC 6 explains 1.79 % of the total dataset. This component clearly isolates the signal caused by the ash fallout on the vegetation surrounding OL. Whereas almost the entire study area displays slightly positive values, the ash affected zone is characterized by highly negative values. This interpretation is consistent with the positive loadings of the months at the end of the eruption which corresponds also to the peak of the 2008 rain season. It is at the end of the growth season (i.e., April-May) that the deviation of the NDVI relative to its expected values based on the precipitation is the highest in the ash fall-affected area.

Vegetation recovery

Trend analysis

Figure 7 illustrates the results for the NDVI linear trend analysis on NDVIcorr time series. The pre-eruption slope values are generally close to zero, with stable vegetation status for the forested areas and more positive values for shrub and herbaceous vegetation, due to a longer and more abundant rain season in 2007 compared to 2005 and 2006. A larger range in slope values is obtained during the eruption (Fig. 7b). Most of the study area displays a positive slope, due to the continuous vegetation improvement associated with an abundant rain season in early 2008. Forested areas display a low sensitivity to precipitation with limited inter-annual variation of NDVI. The zone surrounding Oldoinyo Lengai is characterized by highly negative slope values, due to the rapid degradation of the vegetation state impacted by ash deposition. The steepness of this decreasing trend varies with distance from the volcano summit and the dispersion axis (Fig. 7b).
Fig. 7

Slope values resulting from the OLS trend analysis. Analysis is carried out on NDVIcorr values per pixel for three different time periods: (a) pre-eruptive phase May 2005 – May 2007; (b) during the year of the eruption May 2007- May 2008; (c) post-eruptive phase May 2008 - May 2013; (d) Schematic representation of the temporal evolution of the NDVI for an area affected by ash and the associated trend lines for the three period of interest shown in a, b and c

In the post-eruptive phase from May 2008-May 2013, the highest positive slope values are observed in the outer part of the ash fall zone as defined by the principal component analysis (Fig. 7c). These pixels are recovering, and have a higher increase in NDVI during the growing season compared to areas that have not been affected by ash deposition (Fig. 7d). In the direct proximity of OL, the slope values are close to zero suggesting limited to no recovery of the vegetation. It should be noted that the range of slope values is smaller than in previous time periods, due to the longer duration of the time series.

Vegetation recovery index

The transformation of NDVIcorr values to recovery indices is carried out to highlight the evolution of the ash-affected vegetation after the eruption ends. The different recovery indexes compare, on a pixel-to-pixel basis, the vegetation state after the eruption with its state before the eruption (see section 3.3; Table 1).

Figure 8a illustrates the Lack of Greenness (LG), which simply subtracts the pre-eruption value from the post-eruptive value, 1, 12 and 36 months after the end of the eruption. Directly after the eruption, the ash-affected area is characterized by strongly negative LG values, with values increasing towards the edge of the affected zone. Up to 25 km West of OL, the LG values are significantly below the variation observed within the surrounding area, suggesting a significant impact of ash on vegetation. After 3 years, the distal parts of the ash affected zone have totally recovered, with a vegetation status better than before the eruption (positive LG values). Only a limited zone extending 10 and 7 km west of OL still displays a significant impact in May 2009 and 2011, respectively.
Fig. 8

Vegetation recovery indices for the ash affected area and its direct surroundings 1 month (first row), 12 months (second row) and 36 months (third row) after the end of the eruption. The graphs at the bottom give the temporal evolution of the recovery index value for the pixel marked by a red point in A for the period May 2008 to May 2013. a: Lack of Greenness (LG); (b) Change in NDVI (Tc); (c) Ash Recovery Index (ARI)

Figure 8b illustrates the change in NDVI (Tc). Tc returns a high value for ash-affected vegetation and its value decreases with vegetation recovery. A similar spatial pattern is observed as for the LG index but the contrast within the ash-affected area is higher.

Figure 8c shows the Ash Recovery Index (ARI). Low ARI values characterize the ash fall zone whereas vegetation outside the ash-affected zone shows values close to, or above, one. Although the recovery dynamics of the ash-affected area is well characterized by this index, the contrast is low with the vegetation not-affected by the ash, in the north-west and south-east of the study area. After 3 years, the values of the ARI index in the central part of the ash-affected zone are similar to the other parts of the study area, but the edge of the ash-affected zone displays higher values.

All three indices succeed in highlighting the spatio-temporal evolution of the vegetation recovery within the ash-affected area. The index values one month after the eruption match the mapping of the ash-affected vegetation with PCA, but extent further to the West (Figs. 5, 6 and 7). With time, the area affected by thinner ash deposition recovers, and the zone where vegetation remains affected diminishes in size. After 3 years, only a 3 x 7 km area still shows degraded vegetation. Also, the edge of the ash-affected area displays high values of the indices (mostly with LG and ARI): this suggests that vegetation which recovers after being affected by a thin ash cover is in a better state than before the eruption.

Logarithmic regression

The slope of the logarithmic regression of the recovery indices through time reflects the recovery rate. Half and full recovery time were calculated as the time required for each pixel to reach half or the same value of the recovery index respectively, as calculated before the eruption.

Figure 9 shows the slope of the logarithmic regression and the derived recovery time per pixel for the ARI index. All recovery indices resulted in the same spatial pattern for parameters of the logarithmic regression fitting. The ash-affected area surrounding OL can be sub-divided into two zones (Fig. 9a). The proximal area, limited to OL west flank and basis affected by the thickest ash deposition, is characterized by low to zero slope values. These indicate that there is a very slow recovery or no recovery. The external part of the ash-affected zone in the main wind direction is characterized by high slope values. These indicate that there is a rapid recovery. One to three years is estimated as the time for full recovery in these peripheral zones of the ash-fall area. For the central part, the recovery was not completed after 5 years (Fig. 9b and c).
Fig. 9

Map of the logarithmic regression parameters for fitting the Ash Recovery Index (ARI) values through time. (a) Slope values, (b) Half recovery time (c) Full recovery time. (d) Logarithmic regression between the measured ash thickness and the slope values of the ARI. (e) Spatial distribution of field points for which thickness is documented. Grey values in D and E marks points for which no positive vegetation evolution is observed. The purple ellipse in a, b, c and e show the location of the 3 cm isopach line used for volume interpolation

Relationship with ash thickness

Also examined was whether the recovery rate of the vegetation, measured by the slope of the logarithmic regression, can be related to the thickness of ash measured in the field. Using 144 ash thickness points measured in the field, all recovery indices showed a general power law relationship with the observed ash thickness. The statistically best fit is found for the Ash Recovery Index (R2 = 0.28), followed by the Change in NDVI Tc (R2 = 0.25) with weaker fitting for other indices. Points where a thin ash layer was observed are characterized by high value of the recovery slope whereas a thicker ash layer corresponds to a lower value of slope recovery indices. In addition to the limited spatial and thickness ranges of field data, the large scatter around these power law trends highlights the fact that ash thickness is only but one factor affecting the recovery rate and that the relationship between ash thickness and recovery rate might not be a continuous one but could be controlled by ash thickness thresholds. Differences in the statistical relationships between the different indices might be attributed to the capacity of the various indices in capturing the dynamics of the vegetation recovery and their sensitivity to seasonal and inter-annual rainfall variations.

Some field measured ash thicknesses do not fit the relationship as they are characterized by a negative slope for the logarithmic regression model, i.e., the vegetation state is not improving in the five years following the eruption (Fig. 9d). Negative recovery slopes are obtained for points characterized by a thin ash layer. Of the 15 to 22 points (10–15 % of total dataset) that had to be excluded from the analysis, two were considered as abnormal measurements: over 20 cm of ash was measured by Sherrod more than 7 km north-east of the volcano. These observations do not match with the other points and could be attributed to local ash reworking and accumulation or erroneous identification of the layer caused by the 2007–08 eruption. Over 80 % of the remaining excluded points (10–13 data points) have ash thicknesses of 3 cm or less and are located upwind from the volcano (Fig. 9e). 30 % of the points that do display a significant vegetation recovery are also characterized by ash thicknesses of 3 cm or less. However, it can be considered that 3 cm of ash is the threshold thickness above which all vegetation types in the study area showed a significant recovery trend after the eruption, and thus the ash thickness required to systematically affect the state of vegetation.

Eruption volume estimation

The extent of the ash-affected vegetation can be used to estimate the eruptive volume of the OL 2007–2008 eruption. As the field data are insufficient to define a detailed deposit thinning trend based on a sufficient number of isopach lines (e.g., Bonadonna and Costa 2012), we used a spatial interpolation technique to derive the thickness distribution based on available constraints. In addition to the field-measured ash-thickness points, the following assumptions were made to constrain the ash volume: 1. the largest field-measured ash thickness (84 cm) was also attributed to OL summit; 2. the elliptical zone of ash-affected vegetation identified in Fig. 9 was defined as the 3 cm isopach, based on the above defined threshold; 3. two additional ellipses reaching 50 and 100 km downwind from OL where defined for the 1 and 0 mm ash thickness, respectively. The latter constraints are based on the largest distance of reports mentioning ash fallout. These boundaries are poorly defined but are needed to constrain the volume: their assumed position is a conservative one. Based on a total of 705 points, including field observations and sampling along the defined isopach lines, the thickness of the ash layer was interpolated using Inverse Squared Distance Weighted Interpolation (Fig. 10). Although the exact shape of the ash fallout area is not represented by this interpolation, it does account for the observed thickness decrease with distance. Integrating this ash fall thickness map gave a new eruptive volume of 1.52 107 m3. 43 % of this volume is deposited on OL flanks, within 3.5 km of the summit. One third of the interpolated volume is deposited beyond the 3 cm isopach line, highlighting the need to better constrain the thinning of the distal deposit. The volume of the cone formed with the N crater of OL (3–4 106 m3; Kervyn et al. 2010) is not accounted for in this interpolation and should be added. This returns a total estimated volume of ~2. 107 m3 for the 2007–08 eruption of OL, corresponding to an eruption magnitude of 3.5 (Pyle 2000).
Fig. 10

Interpolated ash layer thickness for the 2007–08 Oldoinyo Lengai eruption. Ash thickness is interpolated using an inverse distance weighting algorithm using thickness data collected in the field (see Fig. 9e), an isopach line of 3 cm around the ash-affected vegetation as obtained from the Principal Component Analysis (Fig. 9) and a constrain of extent of the 1 mm isopach line. Source of background: ArcGIS Map Services

Discussion

Potential and limitations of the mapping method

The method developed in this paper to map the impact of ash fallout on vegetation and vegetation recovery is based on methods to determine the impacts of forest fire (Diaz-Delgado et al. 1998; Salvador and Pons 1996; Riaño et al. 2002; Diaz-Delgado et al. 2003; Gouveia et al. 2010; Hope et al. 2012). Although the disruption process is different, the impact on vegetation is comparable yet more variable: according to the ash thickness plants might be totally buried, killed but with a rapid plant recovery due to seeds in the soil still being able to germinate (Anderson et al. 2012), or only covered temporarily by ash with a minor decay for a short time period (Ayiris and Delmelle 2012). In the latter case, the effect would be too limited to be detected by temporal change analysis of vegetation by remote sensing.

Although the zone affected by significant ash fallout is restricted to an ~100 km2 area with low population density, the impact of the ash in terms of population relocation was more widespread. A survey of impacts on the population highlighted that thin ash fallout, which was insufficient to have a long term impact on the vegetation status, was enough to prevent livestock from grazing and forced temporary resettlements.

In order to map the effect of ash fallout on vegetation, it is required to isolate the effect of the ash relative to other environmental factors that might affect the state of the vegetation. In a region with very homogeneous vegetation, it is possible to compare the affected vegetation with undisturbed vegetation in the vicinity, in order to remove the effect of other causes of observed variation. In OL area, the topographic and vegetation gradients are substantial. It was therefore required to consider a long enough time series to understand the natural variation of the vegetation: as the variability of rainfall is the main factor controlling the state of vegetation (Reed et al. 2009), it is useful to remove this signal from the time series before mapping the vegetation change due to ash fallout. The limited knowledge of the rainfall pattern in the region led to the implementation of a simple rainfall correction method based on a single interpolated rainfall time series and specific vegetation response time for different classes of vegetation. Although this model is not ideal, it enables to partially remove the rainfall signal in the NDVI time series, and to better highlight the ash fallout pattern. Both the bi-temporal and PCA methods were able to map the extent of the ash affected zone. The bi-temporal comparison was most effective when applied at the peak of the growth season, when the contrast between affected and preserved vegetation was strongest. PCA analysis enabled to isolate the impact of ash on vegetation mainly in one component.

Recovery analysis was carried out on NDVI not corrected for rainfall variation, but these analyses were systematically implemented over time series of several years, in order to limit the influence of inter-annual seasonal variations. Both the trend analysis and the different recovery indices analysed had the ability to map the dynamic of vegetation change just after and within the five years following the end of the eruption. Results obtained at the end of the eruption highlight that rainfall-correction is not essential to identify ash-affected area, although the contrast with non-affected areas is enhanced thanks to this rainfall correction.

The difference between the different recovery methods lies in the contrast between the recorded evolution within the ash-affected zone and the variability caused by other factors in the rest of the study area. In that perspective the Change of NDVI (Tc) index proposed by Lu et al. (2012) performed best as it accounts for the normal seasonal variation in the time series.

The affected vegetation around OL is mostly characterized by a grassland and shrub savannah with scattered trees (Reed et al. 2009). Forests being only present on the flank of the Highlands were not significantly affected by the ash fallout. Such low vegetation is more likely to be affected by a limited ash thickness. Wilson et al. (2011) noted that in Argentina, 10 cm of ash was sufficient to totally bury winter pastures, but that vegetation could survive or quickly re-establish through an ash layer of <7 cm – or even <12 cm were there was no water shortage. Water and wind help vegetation recovery by stimulating erosion (Wilson et al. 2011; De Rose et al. 2011). Anderson et al. (2012) similarly highlighted the role of rainfall amount in controlling the germination of seeds after fires in the Serengeti region.

Our comparison with measured ash thickness suggests that 3 cm of ash was enough to disturb the state of the vegetation around OL sufficiently to be evidenced in our change analysis. However, zones affected by a thin ash layer were shown to recover over one year, whereas locations with more than 8–10 cm of ash needed several years to start recovering. It remains to be tested if a similar vegetation change analysis would perform well for forest vegetation. Similarly, the OL eruption took place in a dry environment with limited rainfall during the eruption: the role of rainfall in removing ash and therefore reducing impact on vegetation should also be considered when implementing this method in other climatic settings.

Vegetation recovery as a proxy for ash distribution?

Wilson et al. (2011) found a positive linear relationship between ash depth and length of land abandonment following an eruption. It was thus here postulated that the duration of the vegetation recovery or the recovery rate could be related to the ash thickness deposited on the vegetation. The elliptical shape and concentric pattern for the slope of the logarithmic trend of the recovery index over time and of the recovery duration indeed suggest a systematic variation of these parameters with ash thickness (Fig. 9). A power law statistical relationship is shown to approximate, although with low level of fitting, the relationship between measured ash thickness in the field and the slope value of the recovery trend. This suggests that the recovery rate is partially controlled by the ash thickness but that this relationship is non-linear and may be controlled by threshold values.

The limited spatial extent of the field measurements of ash thickness and the 250 m spatial resolution of the vegetation indices limits the accuracy of this statistical analysis and the identification of an ash thickness threshold sufficient to significantly affect the vegetation. Several centimeters of ash (3–5 cm) are probably enough to kill the surface vegetation, but seeds and roots are preserved in the soil and can lead to vegetation establishment quickly after the end of the eruption. On the other hand, for thicker ash coverage, the formation of a new soil layer is required to establish new plants, leading to a much longer recovery period.

As noted by previous authors (De Rose et al. 2011), vegetation recovery also depends on terrain morphology, geology and watershed morphology: as topography and water availability are characterized by large gradients in the study area, it can be expected that ash thickness will only be one factor controlling the recovery rate. Notwithstanding these limitations, the link between ash thickness and vegetation recovery enables to further constrain the variation in thickness of the ash layer around OL. Using conservative assumptions on the maximal extent of the ash layer, which cannot be inferred from vegetation change analysis, the volume derived in this study is two times larger than the 107 m3 volume estimated by Kervyn et al. (2010) based on limited field reports. Although the distal layer is poorly constrained, the field observations constrain the ash layer on OL lower flank and base, and the vegetation analysis extends this constraint to the ~100 km2 most affected by the ash fallout, including 64 % of the total estimated ash volume. The produced isopach map is an approximation of the ash deposited over the entire eruption period, and does not account for individual ash clouds which sometimes drifted in contrasted directions, depositing thin ash layers (i.e., <1 cm) to the north or east of the volcano.

Conclusion

We presented a temporal analysis of an 8-year long NDVI time series in the region around Oldoinyo Lengai volcano spanning across the 2007–08 eruption period. After correcting the time series for errors and rainfall-induced variation, a ~100 km2 area where vegetation was severely impacted by ash was highlighted using bi-temporal comparison and principal component analysis. Linear temporal trend analysis and different vegetation recovery indices inspired from the literature on forest fire recovery were used to document the spatio-temporal pattern of vegetation recovery. The recovery rate and total duration was shown to be influenced by the spatial variation of ash thickness, with a thickness of 3 cm of ash being identified as the threshold for causing severe and systematic decay and subsequent recovery of the vegetation cover.

The proposed approach to estimate ash layer distribution and approximate thickness based on impact on the vegetation bears promises for characterizing ash layers in remote locations where field work is limited. Sufficient field observations are however required to calibrate the relationship. It is also expected that such an approach will work best for grassland and shrubland vegetation and in cases where rainfall did not remobilize the ash layer during or directly after the eruption.

The management of the OL eruption crisis and its impact by the Tanzanian authorities was limited to a restriction of access to the volcano during the eruption, without specific enforcement measures. No systematic effort was done in order to monitor the impact of the ash on the population and the environment, nor were recommendations or logistic support provided for the relocated population, to the exception of NGO’s. The results of vegetation change analysis presented here, if started directly after the eruption and continued over several months to years, would help to estimate the extent and duration of the impact and to direct long term recovery support to the communities located in the most affected zones as identified by the change detection analysis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted in the framework of the MSc thesis of AdS at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel and KU Leuven. Fieldwork for SAB-S and HBM was covered by Swiss National Science Foundation grants 200021_129985 and 200020_144421. We are thankful to D. Sherrod and J. de Moor for sharing ash thickness data points they measured in the field. We would like to acknowledge the long term contribution of B. Dawson, who pioneered volcanology research in Tanzania and at Oldoinyo Lengai specifically. Until his death in 2013 he remained very active and available to support new research in the region.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Geography, Earth System Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
(2)
Cartography and GIS Research Group, Department of Geography, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
(3)
Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)
(4)
Department of Geology, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Dar-es-Salaam

References

  1. Anderson TM, Schutz M, Risch AC (2012) Seed germination cues and the importance of the soil seed bank across an environmental gradient in the Serengeti. Oikos 121(2):306–312. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19803.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayiris PM, Delmelle P (2012) The immediate environmental effects of tephra emission. Bull Volcanol 74:1905–1936View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell K, Kjarsgaard BA, Simonetti A (1998) Carbonatites- Into the twenty-first century. J Petrol 39(11–12):1839–1845View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonadonna C, Costa A (2012) Estimating the volume of tephra deposits: a new simple strategy. Geology 40(5):415–418. doi:10.1130/g32769.1 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosshard-Stadlin SA, Mattsson HB, Keller J (2014) Magma mixing and forced exsolution of CO2 during the explosive 2007–2008 eruption of Oldoinyo Lengai (Tanzania). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 285:229–246View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Carreiras J, Pereira J, Pereira J (2006) Estimation of tree canopy cover in evergreen oak woodlands using remote sensing. For Ecol Manag 23(1–3):45–53View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chou W, LIn W, LIn C (2009) Vegetation recovery patterns assessment at landslides caused by catastrophic earthquake: A case study in central Taiwan. Environ Monit Assess 152:245–257View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Clemente R, Navarro Cerrillo R, Gitas I (2009) Monitoring post-fire regeneration in Mediterranean ecosystems by employing multitemporal satellite imagery. Int J Wildland Fire 18(6):648–658View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson JB (1998) Peralkaline nephelinite-natrocarbonatite relationships at Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania. J Petrol 39(11–12):2077–2094View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson JB, Bowden P, Clark GC (1968) Activity of the carbonatite volcano Oldoinyo Lengai, 1966. Geol Rundsch 57:865–879View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson JB, Keller J, Nyamweru C (1995) Historic and recent eruptive activity of Oldoinyo Lengai. IAVCEI Proc Volcanol 4:4–22Google Scholar
  12. de Moor J, Fischer TP, King PL, Sharp Z, Shaw AM, Mangasini F (2008) Volatile chemistry of the 2007 to present explosive eruption of Oldoinyo Lengai Volcano, East African Rift. Paper presented at the Fall Meeting 2008, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  13. de Moor J, Fischer TP, King PL, Botcharnikov RE, Hervig RL, Hilton DR, Barry PH, Mangasini F, Ramirez C (2013) Volatile-rich silicate melts from Oldoinyo Lengai volcano (Tanzania): Implications for carbonatite genesis and eruptive behavior. Earth Planet Sci Lett 361:379–390View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. De Rose RC, Ogushi T, Morishima W, Collado M (2011) Land cover change on Mt. Pinatubo, the Philippines, monitored using ASTER VNIR. Int J Remote Sensing 32(24):9279–9305View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. del Moral R, Grishin SY (1999) Volcanic disturbances and ecosystem recovery. In: Walker LR (ed) Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground. Elsevier Science, pp 137–154Google Scholar
  16. Delmelle P (2003) Environmental impacts of tropospheric volcanic gas plumes. In: Volcanic Degassing, vol 213. Geological Society Special Publication. pp 381–399. doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.2003.213.01.23
  17. Delmelle P, Stix J, Baxter PJ, Garcia-Alvarez J, Barquero J (2002) Atmospheric dispersion, environmental effects and potential health hazard associated with the low-altitude gas plume of Masaya volcano, Nicaragua. Bull Volcanol 64(6):423–434. doi:10.1007/s00445-002-0221-6 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Diaz-Delgado R, Salvador R, Pons X (1998) Monitoring of plant community regeneration after fire by remote sensing. In: Trabaud L (ed) Fire management and landscape ecology. International Association of Wildland Fire, Fairfield, pp 315–326Google Scholar
  19. Diaz-Delgado R, Lloret F, Pons X (2003) Influence of fire severity on plant regeneration by means of remote sensing imagery. Int J Remote Sensing 24(8):1751–1763View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ding MJ, Zhang YL, Liu LS, Zhang W, Wang ZF, Bai WQ (2007) The relationship between NDVI and precipitation on the Tibetan Plateau. J Geogr Sci 17(3):259–268. doi:10.1007/s11442-007-0259-7 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ernst GGJ, Kervyn M, Teeuw RM (2008) Advances in the remote sensing of volcanic activity and hazards, with special consideration for applications in developing countries. Int J Remote Sensing 29:6687–6723View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. FAO (1998) AFRICOVER land cover classification. www.africover.org. June 2013
  23. Frenzen PM (1992) Mount St. Helens - a laboratory for research and education. Journal of Forestry 90:14–18Google Scholar
  24. Gouveia C, DaCamara CC, Trigo RM (2010) Post-fire vegetation recovery in Portugal based on spot/vegetation data. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:673–684View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Green K, Kempka D, Lackey L (1994) Using remote-sensing to detect and monitor land-cover and land-use change. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60(3):331–337Google Scholar
  26. Harrington L, Harrington J, Frenzen PM (1998) Vegetation change in the Mount St. Helens (USA) blast zone, 1979–1992. Geocarto-international 13:75–82View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hope A, Albers N, Bart R (2012) Characterizing post-fire recovery of fynbos vegetation in the western cape region of south africa using MODIS data. Int J Remote Sensing 33(4):979–999View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Huete AR, Didana K, Miuraa T, Rodrigueza EP, Gaoa X, Ferreirab LG (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing Environ 83:195–213View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Jönsson P, Eklundh L (2002) Seasonality extraction by function fitting to time-series of satellite sensor data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40(8):1824–1832View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jönsson P, Eklundh L (2004) TIMESAT - a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data. Comput Geosci 30:833–845View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Keller J, Klaudius J, Kervyn M, Ernst GGJ, Mattson HB (2010) Fundamental changes in the activity of the natrocarbonatite volcano Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania, I. New magma composition during the 2007-2008 explosive eruptions. Bull Volcanol 72:893–912View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kervyn M, Ernst GGJ, Klaudius J, Keller J, Kervyn F, Mattsson HB, Betlon F, Mbede E, Jacobs P (2008) Voluminous lava flows at Oldoinyo Lengai in 2006: Chronology of events and insights into the shallow magmatic system of a natrocarbonatite volcano. Bull Volcanol 70:1069–1086View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Kervyn M, Ernst GGJ, Keller J, Vaughan RG, Klaudius J, Pradal E, Belton F, Mattsson HB, Mbede E, Jacobs P (2010) Fundamental changes in the activity of the natrocarbonatite volcano Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania: II. Eruptive behaviour during the 2007–2008 explosive eruptions. Bull Volcanol 72:913–931View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Klaudius J, Keller J (2006) Peralkaline silicate lavas at Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania. Lithos 91(1–4):173–190View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Koepenick KW, Brantley SL, Thompson JM, Rowe GL, Nyblade AA, Moshy C (1996) Volatile emissions from the crater and flank of Oldoinyo Lengai volcano, Tanzania. J Geophys Res 101(B6):13819–13830View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lhermitte S, Verbesselt J, Verstraeten WW, Coppin P (2010) A pixel based regeneration index using time series similarity and spatial context. Photogrammic Eng Remote Sensing 76(6):673–682View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. LPDAAC (2013) Land processes Distributed Active Archive Center, Datapool @ LP DAACGoogle Scholar
  38. Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E (2004) Change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sensing 25(12):2365–2407. doi:10.1080/0143116031000139863 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Lu T, Zeng H, Luo Y, Wang Q, Shi F, Sun G, Wu Y, Wu N (2012) Monitoring vegetation recovery after China's May 2008 wenchuan earthquake using landsat TM time-series data: a case study in Mao county. Ecol Res 27:955–966View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Markogianni V, Dimitriou E, Kalivas DP (2012) Land-use and vegetation change detection in Plastira artificial lake catchment (Greece) by using remote-sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Remote Sensing 34(4):1265–1281View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin RS, Watt SFL, Pyle DM, Mather TA, Matthews NE, Georg RB, Day JA, Fairhead T, Witt MLI, Quayle BM (2009) Environmental effects of ashfall in Argentina from the 2008 Chaitén volcanic eruption. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 184:462–472View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Marzen L, Szantoib Z, Harrington LMB, Harrington JA (2011) Implications of management strategies and vegetation change in the Mount St. Helens blast zone. Geocarto International 26(5):359–376View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitchell RH, Dawson JB (2007) The September 24th, 2007 ash eruption of the carbonatite volcano, Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania: Mineralogy of the ash and implications for formation of new hybrid magma type. Mineral Mag 71:483–492View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Msami A (2007) The effects of the Oldoinyo Lengia volcanic eruption - What do we need to do? . Pastoralists Indigenous Non Governmental Organizations forumGoogle Scholar
  45. NEMC (2008) Rapid assessment of environmental impact arising from volcanic eruption at Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania. Internal Report of the National Environment Management Council. National Environment Management CouncilGoogle Scholar
  46. Olsson P, Jönsson A, Eklundh L (2012) A new invasive insect in Sweden - Physokermes inopinatus: Tracing forest damage with satellite based remote sensing. For Ecol Manag 2885:29–37View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Pyle DM (2000) Sizes of volcanic eruptions. In: Sigurdsson H, Houghton BF, McNutt SR, Rymer H, Stix J (eds) Encyclopedia of volcanoes. Academic, Sand Diego, pp 263–269Google Scholar
  48. Razali SM, Nuruddin AA (2011) Assessment of Water Content using Remote Sensing Normalized Difference Water Index: Preliminary Study. In: IEEE International Conference on Space Science and Communication (Icon Space), Penang, Malaysia, 12–13 July 2011Google Scholar
  49. Reed DN, Anderson TM, Dempewolf J, Metzger K, Serneels S (2009) The spatial distribution of vegetation types in the Serengeti ecosystem: the influence of rainfall and topographic relief on vegetation patch characteristics. J Biogeogr 36(4):770–782. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02017.x View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Riaño D, Chuvieco E, Ustin S, Zomer R, Dennison P, Roberts D, Salas J (2002) Assessment of vegetation regeneration after fire through multitemporal analysis of AVIRIS images in the Santa Monica Mountains. Remote Sens Environ 79:60–71View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Saito G, Mino N, Ogawa S, Murakami T, Isitsuka N, Cong M, Durnayac MM, Evangelista AM, Ohkura H The environmental monitoring for Mt. Pinatubo Area, in the Philippines using Satellite Optical and SAR data. In: 19th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing (ACRS), Manilla, 1998. Asian Association of Remote Sensing, pp GEO98-97Google Scholar
  52. Salvador R, Pons X (1996) Analysis of the discrimination of burnt sites temporal evolution in a Mediterranean Area. EARSeL Adv Remote Sensing 4:159–169Google Scholar
  53. Schowengerdt RA (2007) Remote sensing: Models and methods for image processing. Elsevier, Third edition ednGoogle Scholar
  54. Sherrod DR, Magigita MM, Kwelwa S (2013) Geologic map of oldonyo lengai (oldoinyo lengai) volcano and surroundings, arusha region, unites republic of Tanzania. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1306:70Google Scholar
  55. Solano R, Didan K, Jacobson A, Huete A (2010) MODIS Vegetation Index User’s Guide. http://vip.arizona.edu/documents/MODIS/MODIS_VI_UsersGuide_01_2012.pdf. 2013
  56. Stadlin SA (2015) Fragmentation, eruption dynamics and depositional processes in mixed carbonatite-silicate volcanic eruptions. ETH Zurich, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor BW (1957) Plant succession on recent volcanoes in Papua. J Ecol 45:233–243View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8(2):127–150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Vaughan RG, Kervyn M, Realmuto V, Abrams M, Hook SJ (2008) Satellite measurements of recent volcanic activity at Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 173:196–206View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Veraverbeke S, Gitas I, Katagis T, Polychronaki A, Somers B, Goossens R (2012) Assessing post-fire vegetation recovery using red-near infrared vegetation indices: Accounting for background and vegetation variability. IPRS J Photogrammetr Remote Sensing 68:28–39View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Vermote E, El Saleous N, Justice C (2002) Atmospheric correction of the MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: First results. Remote Sens Environ 83:97–111View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Viovy N, Arino O, Belward AP (1992) The Best Index slope extraction (BISE): a method for reducing noise in NDVI time series. Int J Remote Sensing 13:1585–1590View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. White F (1986) La végétation de l'Afrique: mémoire accompagnant la carte de végétation de l'Afrique UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO. ORSTOM, UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson T, Cole J, Cronin SJ, Stewart C, Johnston D (2011) Impacts on agriculture following the 1991 eruption of Vulcan Hudson, Patagonia: lessons for recovery. Nat Hazards 57:185–212View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Zaitsev AN, Keller J (2006) Mineralogical and chemical transformation of Oldoinyo Lengai natrocarbonatites, Tanzania. Lithos 91(1–4):191–207View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou H, van Rompaey A, Wang J (2009) Detecting the impact of the “Grain for Green” program on the mean annual vegetation cover in the Shaanxi province, China using SPOT-VGT NDVI data. Land Use Policy 26:954–960View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© De Schutter et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.